SR. Pedro Pablo Kuczynski:
has to clarify the allegation that Mr Manuel raised Dammert, not legal violence, "that insurance and won - has to be a statement of understanding and mutual respect among yourselves, if you can. .. I I think so, but we must not be arrogant. Dammert Manuel is not so great millionaire to pay a fine for defamation. Piety, without the mask of contempt, also enlarges.
Mr. PPK Remember that it is better to lose all the money you have to lose internal peace. I have to put this nasty business at the table, I admire him for all his qualities, but I do not believe in the subservience, in the total and without considering the consequences.
My job is to say what I feel, I'm sorry if that came to bother, I'm an artist, family Núñez Ureta.
BY MR MANUEL Dammert PUBLIC OPINION:
June 23, 2006
On Friday June 23 at 9 am Manuel Dammert Ego Aguirre, advisor to the National Federation Enapu workers, has been notified by 40 th Criminal Court of Lima, in the AR N ° 208-06-Q, Sec Houses to be presented on Monday 27 at 9 am to that Court, on pain of being driven or power level, to yield preliminary hearing, and on Wednesday 29 to viewing the evidence in open RESEARCH SUMMARY Based on the complaint of a crime against the honor-Defamation Aggravated by grievance press Pedro Pablo Kuczynski Godard, filed on April 28, 2006.
The complainant states that would have committed the alleged crime of defamation through two interviews given in the "Today With Hildebrandt" in the TV station Frecuencia Latina, various articles published in the newspaper La Republica, and interviews on Radio 1160, referred to issues of ports, airports Jorge Chavez Camisea gas, and other activities in which Manuel Dammert Ego Aguirre denounced lobystas activities, which mixes the public with the private interest of the finance company owned LAEMF Pedro Pablo Kuczynski Godard.
This RESEARCH SUMMARY Pedro Pablo Kuczynski Godard sought civil damages of a million suns, the seizure of goods Dammert and restrictive subpoena barred from leaving the country, security deposit of 100,000 new soles and book signing once a month. Are accredited 6 lawyers, led by Attorney Enrique Ghersi.
The suit against Dammert Ego Aguirre Manuel violates the basic principles of constitutional law in the civil rights of review and oversight, in the terms of the powers to control and investigate public affairs and the defense of national interests, in this case port. An attempt is made untouchable officials, grant impunity for their acts, and frighten the exercise of freedom of speech and press.
It is a desperate ploy to try to get under the cover of a lawsuit to prevent the enforcement of the acts of the outgoing government, which has Pedro Pablo Kuczynski Godard had important responsibilities as President of the Council of Ministers and Minister of Economy and Finance. Intended to be carried out in a peremptory fashion, without the presentation or evaluation of that respect is in documents and congressional investigations, without mentioning who have substantive contributions to the matter, and without evaluating the constitutional principles are violated.
THREATENS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF CITIZENS IN THE OPINION AND CONTROL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS
qualifies as "defamation", which are facts for which evidence has been submitted and are part of an acute competing public policy of the country is informed. I refer to my book on the branch Lobysta published by Fentenapu, which meets my articles published in the newspaper The Republic from 2003 to 2006 and made the complaint against PPK and congressional investigation. I mention only some of these attempts to hide the facts alleged. Among them:
1.1 notes that this is defamation to LAEMF lobysta qualify when they say the documents of the company to define its objectives and rationale.
1.2 notes that indicate that PPK is defamation in activity in this company when it has even been before the Congressional Investigating Committee
1.3 points as defamation to say that LAEMF owned by PPK, manages 25% of the shares in Cosapi, when this is a public fact recorded in the company's own documents, which participated in the airport concession.
as defamation 1.4 notes indicating that the RS 098, the responsibility of PPK, an abuse of authority to assign ports to Proinversión its own powers to the National Port Authority in the conduct of the investment process, even when this legal violation has been corrected to be rescinded that RS 098 other Supreme Resolution.
defamation 1.5 notes that it is submit LAEMF members of the company, owned by PPK; in has several partners, including a longtime member of the Grupo Romero, when this is a proven fact in the records of the company mentioned.
purport to nullify the prosecutorial power by subtracting CONGRESS TO THE JUDICIARY AND TRIVIAL EXCUSES UNDER THE PARLIAMENTARY RESPONSIBILITIES IN RESEARCH ON THE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE ALLEGATIONS PPK AND ABUSE OF AUTHORITY AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
The facts that are the subject of the complaint of PPK have been presented by Manuel Dammert Ego Aguirre in the congressional oversight committee. Taking into account the seriousness and presentation of these documents, Congressional Commission opened this investigation. Several congressmen recently elected, have announced to present the need to investigate challenges to the governance of PPK, in matters having to do with conflicts of interest and abuse of authority, among others, those relating to company LAEMF, Jorge Chavez Airport , ports, etc.
The Complaint seeks Dammert PPK against violating the constitutional principle of the legislative powers to control public affairs, especially the executive, for that matter attempt to negate in Congress, and by way of a summary investigation into alleged "defamation" about events reported in the press, transform the judiciary in that impedes the investigation request that Congress has made and this will be continued in the new Congress recently elected.
INTENDED intimidate FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND PRESS FREEDOM FOR THE CONTROL OF THE ACTS OF THE GOVERNMENT, ESPECIALLY THE OUTGOING GOVERNMENT
PPK Complaint identifies the offense all that constitutes oversight role that the press must Share. Considered defamation: report, presentation of evidence, conflicting statements, critics of the abuse of power and public service, questions about the overlap of private interests with public. The Complaint seeks to impose an unconstitutional system of coercion of freedom of speech and press would negate the oversight role of the press as an actor independent of the public.
I have a public life dedicated to the interests of the country, more than 40 years, and have faced many illegal acts of officials State that are neo-patrimonial, confusing the public with private interests and personal. The Complaint against me, violates the constitutional principles to establish impunity, and in general to impose a regime of coercion against public opinion, congressional oversight and the freedom of the press. The country is reported .
Ego Aguirre Manuel Dammert
0 comments:
Post a Comment