Difference B/w Carls Zeiss Or Sony G Lens

Unheard: UGEL 01 MAKES DECISIONS CONTRARY TO COURT OF CIVIL SERVICE (SERVE) IN BUSINESS TO TEACHING ASSIGNMENTS

In recent months, the Civil Service Tribunal - SERVE, created by Leg. 1023, is issuing successive resolutions on economic allocations referred to the Law 24029, Law Faculty, with regard to 30% Class preparation and evaluation, years of service and benefits mourning and funeral expenses, ordering that both UGELs DRELM and take appropriate measures to give effect to the economic recognition of these assignments on behalf of teachers, in particular, 30% of the total remuneration for class preparation and assessment bounded under the law. Contradictory

, lower administrative bodies, such as UGEL 01, do not stop to deny the legitimacy of the demands of teachers on these issues, going against standard criteria adopted by successive rulings of the Constitutional Court, the Judiciary and some regional governments, such as Cuzco and Tumbes, recently. This obviously requires the teacher to navigate the cumbersome procedure the law calls via administrative waste of time and money. It has already become a long habit of directorial decisions UGEL 01 are developed based on a format that in all cases by repeating the same arguments, without making adequate legal reasoning of the claims made by the teachers. Undoubtedly, much intellectual deployment advisers UGEL 01.

What power is having the UGEL to contradict the criteria adopted by the Tribunal's Chambers Civil Service in these matters? Why UGELs that do not follow the rules and criteria and character binding agreements adopted by the Plenary of the TSC?

This indicates that managers and officials of the UGELs, whose maximum standard is a card carrying supporter, just meet political slogans from political power. They are more of the same, eyesores and careerists enslaved to the desktop and seal, without whom none are. Not only do not satisfy, law enforcement, have subordinated their function to the directives of Garcia Perez (NOTHING TO SUTEP). That is his glory, the pinnacle of mediocrity. It is obvious

that if the MINEDU does not comply with the resolutions of the TSC and throw the ball to the MEF, teachers must go via the Judiciary in Enforcement Process, given the nature of matter decided by the resolutions of the TSC, wandering the halls of the Palace of Justice at the expense of scarce resources, which will be made unattainable effective recognition of these assignments.

Now that the competition to elect the directors for the gbo UGEL. Susana Villaran municipal, DEMAND the unrestricted fulfillment of the Law 24029, the cessation of the long campaign of attacks from Garcia Perez and APRA to assume that the government allocations for economic recognition of the allocations in the bounded law. The democrqacia, the rule of law, etc. mean nothing if there is full rspeto to law and the rights granted to teachers in Peru.

PREPARE THE GREAT MOBILIZATION FOR THE DEFENSE OF THE LAW RESTRICTIVE 24029.

CASH FOR PAYMENT OF 30% OF TOTAL REMUNERATION FOR CLASS PREPARATION AND EVALUATION, ECONOMIC AND OTHER ASSIGNMENTS. . . MOBILIZATION NOW.


Posted by Sute Huaycán